Fullmetalachemist V.s. Bleach Game

No case files of children in the orphanage Florhof

supplement to the last entry

I still have the right Medical Records after a few calls, I hang out these to get from the clinic Hard. It would mean first that it was only that of Medical Records (July 11, 2001), which I got with the advice and applied only to the guardianship authority Bülach. For this I I signed, I do not remember.
have signed but I was absolutely sure a confidentiality confinement, where all persons were given by me on it. Subsequently I have received it, signed by me on 23 July 2001. This was, among other things, the Supervisor of the Canton of Zurich, which could confirm how to handle my files. Also on the list there was one prosecutor who called my children and told them that they can not be forced to an opinion. In the report, it is but I would not have my children sent to child and youth mental health services for an opinion. See also the entries
http://namensaenderung.blogspot.com/2008/08/gutachten-ohne-kenntnis-darber.html and
http://namensaenderung.blogspot.com/2007/10/vortuschen-einer-namensnderung.html ( Letter dated 26 April 2001, the last scan).
has also helped the person during the scientific work of my older son, not interviewed, as well as my brother Andres Gasser, living in Schaffhausen.


Esther Zinn and record-keeping on children in the orphanage Florhof

See also http://namensaenderung.blogspot.com/2008/05/das-gutachden-der-klinik-hard-es-wurde . html. How to use the scans of my reports from the Hard Clinic (bottom scans of the aforementioned entry) see, I then get a part of my opinion. In this excerpt also a few statements by Mrs Esther Zinn were held, which was then the matron of the orphanage Florhof. This part I got in September 2002 and called on Mrs. Esther Zinn even then, so that they do their data could explain to my children, see

http://namensaenderung.blogspot.com/2008/09/akteneinsicht-und- namenschaos.html . Even then she did not give any information and is expressed only in an aggressive tone on children and the scientific work of my son.
The copy of the full report, I received recently (see last entry), I now get an insight on all the statements of Mrs. Esther Zinn, now superintendent of the children's castle Regensberg. I therefore called Esther Zinn last week to ask you whether to write the children's home Florhof no reports of the children, as I said before, the current national director of the orphanage Florhof (which surprised me very much). Click here to download tape receptacle 16.

Mrs Zinn confirmed to me that no files will be performed on children. Then I asked, that they can make serious statements (in report) and this evidence should not be. Your statement was that This case is already some years ago and they do not know after 900 children, which was characteristic of which child. They also have no desire to
people like me to discuss after all these years about such things. In the end they said I had done my sons massively broken and she hung up the phone easily. The whole conversation and thus the rest of the conversation can be downloaded as tape receptacle 17 . (My name and are "as valid" diagnosis of Mrs. Esther Zinn I have cut).
After this conversation, I called the District Council and Bulach asked if he could ask Mr. Dürsteler Mrs Zinn, how and where I said to my children 've made ready. Mrs Zinn has the District Council Bülach been no information as to how I should have made my children ready. She also said that no records of children in the passage home
Florhof be performed.
I think it's bad if people can do in positions such as Mrs Zinn serious statements, but must prove this in any way or documented. Their statements were taken but 1 to 1 of verifiers, and their recommendation that my children would have in a long-term home. This opinion of the Department is apparently so hard
property of the authority: the guardianship authority Bülach. These are based again on the advice, and consequently on the testimony Esther Zinn.

I can in my case in an emergency, the statements of Mrs. Esther Zinn refute various documents, but what about those parents and children who can not do?
As you can see even in my story, but can occur such files again.

How could read from the entry http://namensaenderung.blogspot.com/2007/07/widersprche-von-frau-evelyne-pente-und.html has, Mrs. Esther Zinn at the exit interview from the passage home Florhof against the teachers of my older son's behavior even more aggressive.

Fullmetalachemist V.s. Bleach Game

No case files of children in the orphanage Florhof

supplement to the last entry

I still have the right Medical Records after a few calls, I hang out these to get from the clinic Hard. It would mean first that it was only that of Medical Records (July 11, 2001), which I got with the advice and applied only to the guardianship authority Bülach. For this I I signed, I do not remember.
have signed but I was absolutely sure a confidentiality confinement, where all persons were given by me on it. Subsequently I have received it, signed by me on 23 July 2001. This was, among other things, the Supervisor of the Canton of Zurich, which could confirm how to handle my files. Also on the list there was one prosecutor who called my children and told them that they can not be forced to an opinion. In the report, it is but I would not have my children sent to child and youth mental health services for an opinion. See also the entries
http://namensaenderung.blogspot.com/2008/08/gutachten-ohne-kenntnis-darber.html and
http://namensaenderung.blogspot.com/2007/10/vortuschen-einer-namensnderung.html ( Letter dated 26 April 2001, the last scan).
has also helped the person during the scientific work of my older son, not interviewed, as well as my brother Andres Gasser, living in Schaffhausen.


Esther Zinn and record-keeping on children in the orphanage Florhof

See also http://namensaenderung.blogspot.com/2008/05/das-gutachden-der-klinik-hard-es-wurde . html. How to use the scans of my reports from the Hard Clinic (bottom scans of the aforementioned entry) see, I then get a part of my opinion. In this excerpt also a few statements by Mrs Esther Zinn were held, which was then the matron of the orphanage Florhof. This part I got in September 2002 and called on Mrs. Esther Zinn even then, so that they do their data could explain to my children, see

http://namensaenderung.blogspot.com/2008/09/akteneinsicht-und- namenschaos.html . Even then she did not give any information and is expressed only in an aggressive tone on children and the scientific work of my son.
The copy of the full report, I received recently (see last entry), I now get an insight on all the statements of Mrs. Esther Zinn, now superintendent of the children's castle Regensberg. I therefore called Esther Zinn last week to ask you whether to write the children's home Florhof no reports of the children, as I said before, the current national director of the orphanage Florhof (which surprised me very much). Click here to download tape receptacle 16.

Mrs Zinn confirmed to me that no files will be performed on children. Then I asked, that they can make serious statements (in report) and this evidence should not be. Your statement was that This case is already some years ago and they do not know after 900 children, which was characteristic of which child. They also have no desire to
people like me to discuss after all these years about such things. In the end they said I had done my sons massively broken and she hung up the phone easily. The whole conversation and thus the rest of the conversation can be downloaded as tape receptacle 17 . (My name and are "as valid" diagnosis of Mrs. Esther Zinn I have cut).
After this conversation, I called the District Council and Bulach asked if he could ask Mr. Dürsteler Mrs Zinn, how and where I said to my children 've made ready. Mrs Zinn has the District Council Bülach been no information as to how I should have made my children ready. She also said that no records of children in the passage home
Florhof be performed.
I think it's bad if people can do in positions such as Mrs Zinn serious statements, but must prove this in any way or documented. Their statements were taken but 1 to 1 of verifiers, and their recommendation that my children would have in a long-term home. This opinion of the Department is apparently so hard
property of the authority: the guardianship authority Bülach. These are based again on the advice, and consequently on the testimony Esther Zinn.

I can in my case in an emergency, the statements of Mrs. Esther Zinn refute various documents, but what about those parents and children who can not do?
As you can see even in my story, but can occur such files again.

How could read from the entry http://namensaenderung.blogspot.com/2007/07/widersprche-von-frau-evelyne-pente-und.html has, Mrs. Esther Zinn at the exit interview from the passage home Florhof against the teachers of my older son's behavior even more aggressive.

Fresh Blood After Cervical Biopsy

No direct release of the report of the clinic Hard

From the clinic I have requested my opinion hardware (see last Entry and

http://namensaenderung.blogspot.com/2008/05/das-gutachden-der-klinik-hard-es-wurde.html ). At the same time I became aware of the guardianship authority Bülach requested, my opinions and in two letters stated that a copy of my letters went to the county council Bülach. Of course I sent the letters to the clinic and hardware to the guardianship authority as written. Of the guardianship authority Bülach I got no response from the clinic and hardware following letter:

The hospital said hard, however, that the guardianship authority Bülach is the legal owner of my opinion. According to Dr. Marco Lanz then the report including confidentiality relieve Mr Dürsteler by the District Council served Bülach. A few days later I received a copy of Mr Dürsteler the opinion, but from the secrecy release only that, relating to the guardianship authority Bülach. The other side, on which I have given birth as mine person from maintaining confidentiality and Esther Zinn, I have not received.

Back when I signed the Confidentiality release, I already asked for a copy of this. There was Mr. Schawalder in the stress at that time, he told me that he would bring one next time. This he has not done so on the grounds that there are so many people the copier had. Again the next time the copier was broken and he would send me a copy. Of course, I got a copy.

After I let all the reports have before me, I noticed that none of these persons was asked of me.

The following is an excerpt from the report to detail that Mr. Huber made:
Here you can see that Mr Francis Xavier Huber of the guardianship authority Bülach normally found how to handle my medical Children Act: namely, that the district court simply Bülach was involved for a divorce.
In addition to Mr. Huber was the psychiatrist that he offered added that the name Gritti is deleted. By this statement it is clear that it even had a name change right never to be. In the letter to me (considering the 3 scans / letter of 26 October 1998 the entry http://namensaenderung.blogspot.com/2008/06/ergnzender-eintrag-zu-akte-153-und.html ) but Mr Francis Xavier Huber wrote of the guardianship authority Bülach that it performs a name change, and not simply the deletion of the name Gritti!
is mentioned in the covering letter is not even described a real change of name, but only the deletion of Gritti favor of Flück (then I had a name change sought only to completely Flück).

I also had in 1995 (1 scan / letter of 24 July 1995 in the entry http://namensaenderung.blogspot.com/2007/03/umgang-mit-medizinischen-kinderakten_20.html ) the deletion of "Gritti" in the guardianship authority Illnau-Effretikon applied locally. This was, however, by the Department of the Interior, but not this time accepted.
If it really is that simple but, I wonder, however: What did my lawyer? When I
regarding a telephone conversation with Mr Francis Xavier Huber of the VB Bülach addressed his application to the "name change" in dealing with my files said this, it was made no mistake and it was right, how to handle my file.


is the advice to "disease progression" that I was adopted.
I already have explained 100 times that my brother received an adoption, but I change the name. Access to the file said Dr. Schawalder simply that my file was partially granted. The fact is that I was basically given no access through the VB Bülach. Only after every legal action, I got files. For more content this part of the report see http://namensaenderung.blogspot.com/2007/05/die-medizinische-akte.html and http://namensaenderung.blogspot.com/2007/09/widerlegung-der-aussagen-von-werner.html .

In the same section:
to this section of the opinion, I do not go further here and refer you to a
http://namensaenderung.blogspot.com/2007/03/umgang-mit-medizinischen-kinderakten_20.html ).


It is interesting to read that writing assignable errors and misconduct of the guardianship authority Bülach be represented as delusional on my part. The 4th
last sentence: It should be appreciated that if his statements can not be confirmed by documents that are home are, it is applied thereby. In addition, psychiatrists were unwilling to address the other officials who were able to prove my statements. Only a few persons of the nursing staff were willing to listen properly.


From this excerpt you can see quite clearly that I am in the clinic Bülach not even have my advice to consult. Otherwise I would have
knew even then that the VB Bülach wanted to separate us again. This also explains why I did not get support in finding accommodation and the hearing before the court as long as my children was delayed until it was pointless.
also would have continued the therapy for as long until I had shown a degree of insight. I probably would have then continued to "Zyprexa" and "Temesta" take (see entry: http://namensaenderung.blogspot.com/2008/05/das-gutachden-der-klinik-hard-es-wurde.html ). To date, it is said that no mistakes were made.

Since I have other discrepancies are noticed in the report, I did law degree with the protocol of the district judge. A. Fischer, who made my hearing in the hospital compared Hard. It is amazing to me that Dr. Schawalder a term of the minutes of this hearing very different way, that it was a completely different meaning. Is now
what a judge says it like a psychiatrist or unformulated and this then gives an entirely different situation? In particular, I find it extreme that then the guardianship authority Bülach based on the opinion and not a copy of the protocol had
of the judge. Another time, I will discuss it in detail.


Here is a copy of the ticket from me than I of Canada on the Trans-Canada Airlines from Montreal to Zurich Kloten Airport

, BORDER. To show that I entered as a baby named Flück.

Fresh Blood After Cervical Biopsy

No direct release of the report of the clinic Hard

From the clinic I have requested my opinion hardware (see last Entry and

http://namensaenderung.blogspot.com/2008/05/das-gutachden-der-klinik-hard-es-wurde.html ). At the same time I became aware of the guardianship authority Bülach requested, my opinions and in two letters stated that a copy of my letters went to the county council Bülach. Of course I sent the letters to the clinic and hardware to the guardianship authority as written. Of the guardianship authority Bülach I got no response from the clinic and hardware following letter:

The hospital said hard, however, that the guardianship authority Bülach is the legal owner of my opinion. According to Dr. Marco Lanz then the report including confidentiality relieve Mr Dürsteler by the District Council served Bülach. A few days later I received a copy of Mr Dürsteler the opinion, but from the secrecy release only that, relating to the guardianship authority Bülach. The other side, on which I have given birth as mine person from maintaining confidentiality and Esther Zinn, I have not received.

Back when I signed the Confidentiality release, I already asked for a copy of this. There was Mr. Schawalder in the stress at that time, he told me that he would bring one next time. This he has not done so on the grounds that there are so many people the copier had. Again the next time the copier was broken and he would send me a copy. Of course, I got a copy.

After I let all the reports have before me, I noticed that none of these persons was asked of me.

The following is an excerpt from the report to detail that Mr. Huber made:
Here you can see that Mr Francis Xavier Huber of the guardianship authority Bülach normally found how to handle my medical Children Act: namely, that the district court simply Bülach was involved for a divorce.
In addition to Mr. Huber was the psychiatrist that he offered added that the name Gritti is deleted. By this statement it is clear that it even had a name change right never to be. In the letter to me (considering the 3 scans / letter of 26 October 1998 the entry http://namensaenderung.blogspot.com/2008/06/ergnzender-eintrag-zu-akte-153-und.html ) but Mr Francis Xavier Huber wrote of the guardianship authority Bülach that it performs a name change, and not simply the deletion of the name Gritti!
is mentioned in the covering letter is not even described a real change of name, but only the deletion of Gritti favor of Flück (then I had a name change sought only to completely Flück).

I also had in 1995 (1 scan / letter of 24 July 1995 in the entry http://namensaenderung.blogspot.com/2007/03/umgang-mit-medizinischen-kinderakten_20.html ) the deletion of "Gritti" in the guardianship authority Illnau-Effretikon applied locally. This was, however, by the Department of the Interior, but not this time accepted.
If it really is that simple but, I wonder, however: What did my lawyer? When I
regarding a telephone conversation with Mr Francis Xavier Huber of the VB Bülach addressed his application to the "name change" in dealing with my files said this, it was made no mistake and it was right, how to handle my file.


is the advice to "disease progression" that I was adopted.
I already have explained 100 times that my brother received an adoption, but I change the name. Access to the file said Dr. Schawalder simply that my file was partially granted. The fact is that I was basically given no access through the VB Bülach. Only after every legal action, I got files. For more content this part of the report see http://namensaenderung.blogspot.com/2007/05/die-medizinische-akte.html and http://namensaenderung.blogspot.com/2007/09/widerlegung-der-aussagen-von-werner.html .

In the same section:
to this section of the opinion, I do not go further here and refer you to a
http://namensaenderung.blogspot.com/2007/03/umgang-mit-medizinischen-kinderakten_20.html ).


It is interesting to read that writing assignable errors and misconduct of the guardianship authority Bülach be represented as delusional on my part. The 4th
last sentence: It should be appreciated that if his statements can not be confirmed by documents that are home are, it is applied thereby. In addition, psychiatrists were unwilling to address the other officials who were able to prove my statements. Only a few persons of the nursing staff were willing to listen properly.


From this excerpt you can see quite clearly that I am in the clinic Bülach not even have my advice to consult. Otherwise I would have
knew even then that the VB Bülach wanted to separate us again. This also explains why I did not get support in finding accommodation and the hearing before the court as long as my children was delayed until it was pointless.
also would have continued the therapy for as long until I had shown a degree of insight. I probably would have then continued to "Zyprexa" and "Temesta" take (see entry: http://namensaenderung.blogspot.com/2008/05/das-gutachden-der-klinik-hard-es-wurde.html ). To date, it is said that no mistakes were made.

Since I have other discrepancies are noticed in the report, I did law degree with the protocol of the district judge. A. Fischer, who made my hearing in the hospital compared Hard. It is amazing to me that Dr. Schawalder a term of the minutes of this hearing very different way, that it was a completely different meaning. Is now
what a judge says it like a psychiatrist or unformulated and this then gives an entirely different situation? In particular, I find it extreme that then the guardianship authority Bülach based on the opinion and not a copy of the protocol had
of the judge. Another time, I will discuss it in detail.


Here is a copy of the ticket from me than I of Canada on the Trans-Canada Airlines from Montreal to Zurich Kloten Airport

, BORDER. To show that I entered as a baby named Flück.