Radiotherapy Bone Cancer

obtained of conversations with Jose Line Pampaluchi

The following is a brief excerpt of two calls regarding the same subject line with Jose Pampaluchi Wick (JPW), now living in Winterthur, when I confronted them with all I (now she works as a psychologist). The talks relate to the acts of the blog entries from the 27th December 2006 and second January 2009 .


tape receptacle 18 :

I: I wanted to ask again why did you prevent picking that I could take a lesson.

JPW: Käthi Oh, that's such a long history and so long ago. I am glad you are looking for me again, only this is an unfortunate moment, because my grandson just stoned around me
. And that is quite mad embarrassed than I was [file 27th December 2006, 2 've seen January 2009] . I could not believe this is mine.

I: This is a file from the office, I have some other things.

JPW: But listen again, I really wanted to prevent never never, but I had you
always had very very happy. Otherwise I would not put up with us. I had a feeling you'd rather have a family as such a group home with so many girls where one goes down fast. What has happened, or what led some people have conversations with me today ... I can assure you that I never ever 1-2 terms in a report would write. But imagine once before, I was barely 20 years old.

comes to me over the pretty hypocritical. It was about that I finished school at the orphanage Sonnenbühl and should be followed by training. In Sonnebühl had two groups of boys, one consisting of younger, one from earlier. It was just a girl group of eight girls. How can you "go down" there?
We children had no problems with each other.
addition, she acknowledged half-heartedly, that it has given negative information for my further education after I made the one-year training as a hospital assistant. Then she comes immediately with an apology, but that was hardly have been 20 years old. It's amazing: As they worked in Sonnenbühl and when I got to her, she had two children.


tape receptacle 19 :

I: And why you have not seen that I would like to Brütten training can start and still would have a gap year have to do ... the way I wanted?

JPW: Because apparently ... I do not know the details ... (suspended at me) I

: It had in fact had apprenticeships. For example, as a sculptor. Since you have again made a Ape for "Great man" simply because so many men were working there. At this things I can still remember.

JPW: you have used every opportunity to jump to boys and men.

I: Which men? Tell me again what to men?

JPW: In Old [Andelfingen] the sweet mountain, it has also had young men.


When I came to Wicks, I am first of all come into the world, like the girl next door talking with the mother. In the children's home would have been no such thing tolerated. Young people (Boys and girls) from the old (see above) have contacted me and were all about my age and I jumped, despite its rhetoric to anyone.
I always had to let them know where I went. She should tell me otherwise very clearly that I was not allowed to have contact with other young people.
Here you can see how Jose is contradictory Line Pampaluchi Wick. Also shows that she still represents her old views: My statement to the statements do not like "man-crazy," she denied, but she tries to justify even more!


What I will say again today: There is clearly still not all people that think for
Case, no one responsible. Everyone moves to another authority. I want only one thing: to Home Canada.

Radiotherapy Bone Cancer

obtained of conversations with Jose Line Pampaluchi

The following is a brief excerpt of two calls regarding the same subject line with Jose Pampaluchi Wick (JPW), now living in Winterthur, when I confronted them with all I (now she works as a psychologist). The talks relate to the acts of the blog entries from the 27th December 2006 and second January 2009 .


tape receptacle 18 :

I: I wanted to ask again why did you prevent picking that I could take a lesson.

JPW: Käthi Oh, that's such a long history and so long ago. I am glad you are looking for me again, only this is an unfortunate moment, because my grandson just stoned around me
. And that is quite mad embarrassed than I was [file 27th December 2006, 2 've seen January 2009] . I could not believe this is mine.

I: This is a file from the office, I have some other things.

JPW: But listen again, I really wanted to prevent never never, but I had you
always had very very happy. Otherwise I would not put up with us. I had a feeling you'd rather have a family as such a group home with so many girls where one goes down fast. What has happened, or what led some people have conversations with me today ... I can assure you that I never ever 1-2 terms in a report would write. But imagine once before, I was barely 20 years old.

comes to me over the pretty hypocritical. It was about that I finished school at the orphanage Sonnenbühl and should be followed by training. In Sonnebühl had two groups of boys, one consisting of younger, one from earlier. It was just a girl group of eight girls. How can you "go down" there?
We children had no problems with each other.
addition, she acknowledged half-heartedly, that it has given negative information for my further education after I made the one-year training as a hospital assistant. Then she comes immediately with an apology, but that was hardly have been 20 years old. It's amazing: As they worked in Sonnenbühl and when I got to her, she had two children.


tape receptacle 19 :

I: And why you have not seen that I would like to Brütten training can start and still would have a gap year have to do ... the way I wanted?

JPW: Because apparently ... I do not know the details ... (suspended at me) I

: It had in fact had apprenticeships. For example, as a sculptor. Since you have again made a Ape for "Great man" simply because so many men were working there. At this things I can still remember.

JPW: you have used every opportunity to jump to boys and men.

I: Which men? Tell me again what to men?

JPW: In Old [Andelfingen] the sweet mountain, it has also had young men.


When I came to Wicks, I am first of all come into the world, like the girl next door talking with the mother. In the children's home would have been no such thing tolerated. Young people (Boys and girls) from the old (see above) have contacted me and were all about my age and I jumped, despite its rhetoric to anyone.
I always had to let them know where I went. She should tell me otherwise very clearly that I was not allowed to have contact with other young people.
Here you can see how Jose is contradictory Line Pampaluchi Wick. Also shows that she still represents her old views: My statement to the statements do not like "man-crazy," she denied, but she tries to justify even more!


What I will say again today: There is clearly still not all people that think for
Case, no one responsible. Everyone moves to another authority. I want only one thing: to Home Canada.

Brown Creamy Cm Before Af

addendum and the only admission of error

Addendum to last entry

As the last entry is clear, we were denied a copy of "file-report" of the KJPD (Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Service). Without knowing the contents of which I should allow the District Council Bülach any of these and other documents passes the guardianship authority Opfikon (see last entry, letter of 23 February 2001 ).
course I have not allowed the transfer of an unknown to me, Act of my children.
was later I repeated this as "uncooperative" and accused the order of 23 March 2001 (see scans ( a + b) in the last entry), this has indicated the District Council also Bülach.

According to the order of 23 March 2001 Bulach District Council would have had inquiries in the guardianship authority
Opfikon an "unencumbered new beginning" for the episode. However, this can be impossible if the guardianship authority in Bülach FFE order of 23 April 2001 (see scan below) wrote that the further processing of our case for the purpose of child protection measures to the guardianship authority Opfikon is passed (see also entry of 24 May 2009, above the first scan).

The guardianship authority Bülach had the "File Report" as long retained until they had zubefürchten nothing more. You have the "File Report" only with the letter of 26 April 2001 data protection as a copy sent to us (see feigning a name change, 19 October 2007 ). This, 3 days after the FFE decision was decided!

If I had the file's report of KJPD get the right time, I could defend myself.


The only admission of error

The only time ever was admitted that mistakes were made was in the letter by Ms Karin Wider and Peter Max by the Youth Secretariat Bülach of 19 November 1997.
came to this insight, she soon after the divorce (23 October 1997, see journal refutation of the testimony of Werner Scherrer, 23 September 2007 ). Is much more interesting that Peter Max massively during the divorce was going against me. During the divorce was always heard that the authorities everything went fine, was already after 1 month of this letter, the guardianship authority Bülach had continued to make the same style, and apparently this letter was not noted, although the Letter to the addressees. Even with the supervisory complaint to the District Council Bülach this letter was ignored.

is now only said that not a single mistake was made.

Brown Creamy Cm Before Af

addendum and the only admission of error

Addendum to last entry

As the last entry is clear, we were denied a copy of "file-report" of the KJPD (Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Service). Without knowing the contents of which I should allow the District Council Bülach any of these and other documents passes the guardianship authority Opfikon (see last entry, letter of 23 February 2001 ).
course I have not allowed the transfer of an unknown to me, Act of my children.
was later I repeated this as "uncooperative" and accused the order of 23 March 2001 (see scans ( a + b) in the last entry), this has indicated the District Council also Bülach.

According to the order of 23 March 2001 Bulach District Council would have had inquiries in the guardianship authority
Opfikon an "unencumbered new beginning" for the episode. However, this can be impossible if the guardianship authority in Bülach FFE order of 23 April 2001 (see scan below) wrote that the further processing of our case for the purpose of child protection measures to the guardianship authority Opfikon is passed (see also entry of 24 May 2009, above the first scan).

The guardianship authority Bülach had the "File Report" as long retained until they had zubefürchten nothing more. You have the "File Report" only with the letter of 26 April 2001 data protection as a copy sent to us (see feigning a name change, 19 October 2007 ). This, 3 days after the FFE decision was decided!

If I had the file's report of KJPD get the right time, I could defend myself.


The only admission of error

The only time ever was admitted that mistakes were made was in the letter by Ms Karin Wider and Peter Max by the Youth Secretariat Bülach of 19 November 1997.
came to this insight, she soon after the divorce (23 October 1997, see journal refutation of the testimony of Werner Scherrer, 23 September 2007 ). Is much more interesting that Peter Max massively during the divorce was going against me. During the divorce was always heard that the authorities everything went fine, was already after 1 month of this letter, the guardianship authority Bülach had continued to make the same style, and apparently this letter was not noted, although the Letter to the addressees. Even with the supervisory complaint to the District Council Bülach this letter was ignored.

is now only said that not a single mistake was made.