Fresh Blood After Cervical Biopsy

No direct release of the report of the clinic Hard

From the clinic I have requested my opinion hardware (see last Entry and

http://namensaenderung.blogspot.com/2008/05/das-gutachden-der-klinik-hard-es-wurde.html ). At the same time I became aware of the guardianship authority Bülach requested, my opinions and in two letters stated that a copy of my letters went to the county council Bülach. Of course I sent the letters to the clinic and hardware to the guardianship authority as written. Of the guardianship authority Bülach I got no response from the clinic and hardware following letter:

The hospital said hard, however, that the guardianship authority Bülach is the legal owner of my opinion. According to Dr. Marco Lanz then the report including confidentiality relieve Mr Dürsteler by the District Council served Bülach. A few days later I received a copy of Mr Dürsteler the opinion, but from the secrecy release only that, relating to the guardianship authority Bülach. The other side, on which I have given birth as mine person from maintaining confidentiality and Esther Zinn, I have not received.

Back when I signed the Confidentiality release, I already asked for a copy of this. There was Mr. Schawalder in the stress at that time, he told me that he would bring one next time. This he has not done so on the grounds that there are so many people the copier had. Again the next time the copier was broken and he would send me a copy. Of course, I got a copy.

After I let all the reports have before me, I noticed that none of these persons was asked of me.

The following is an excerpt from the report to detail that Mr. Huber made:
Here you can see that Mr Francis Xavier Huber of the guardianship authority Bülach normally found how to handle my medical Children Act: namely, that the district court simply Bülach was involved for a divorce.
In addition to Mr. Huber was the psychiatrist that he offered added that the name Gritti is deleted. By this statement it is clear that it even had a name change right never to be. In the letter to me (considering the 3 scans / letter of 26 October 1998 the entry http://namensaenderung.blogspot.com/2008/06/ergnzender-eintrag-zu-akte-153-und.html ) but Mr Francis Xavier Huber wrote of the guardianship authority Bülach that it performs a name change, and not simply the deletion of the name Gritti!
is mentioned in the covering letter is not even described a real change of name, but only the deletion of Gritti favor of Flück (then I had a name change sought only to completely Flück).

I also had in 1995 (1 scan / letter of 24 July 1995 in the entry http://namensaenderung.blogspot.com/2007/03/umgang-mit-medizinischen-kinderakten_20.html ) the deletion of "Gritti" in the guardianship authority Illnau-Effretikon applied locally. This was, however, by the Department of the Interior, but not this time accepted.
If it really is that simple but, I wonder, however: What did my lawyer? When I
regarding a telephone conversation with Mr Francis Xavier Huber of the VB Bülach addressed his application to the "name change" in dealing with my files said this, it was made no mistake and it was right, how to handle my file.


is the advice to "disease progression" that I was adopted.
I already have explained 100 times that my brother received an adoption, but I change the name. Access to the file said Dr. Schawalder simply that my file was partially granted. The fact is that I was basically given no access through the VB Bülach. Only after every legal action, I got files. For more content this part of the report see http://namensaenderung.blogspot.com/2007/05/die-medizinische-akte.html and http://namensaenderung.blogspot.com/2007/09/widerlegung-der-aussagen-von-werner.html .

In the same section:
to this section of the opinion, I do not go further here and refer you to a
http://namensaenderung.blogspot.com/2007/03/umgang-mit-medizinischen-kinderakten_20.html ).


It is interesting to read that writing assignable errors and misconduct of the guardianship authority Bülach be represented as delusional on my part. The 4th
last sentence: It should be appreciated that if his statements can not be confirmed by documents that are home are, it is applied thereby. In addition, psychiatrists were unwilling to address the other officials who were able to prove my statements. Only a few persons of the nursing staff were willing to listen properly.


From this excerpt you can see quite clearly that I am in the clinic Bülach not even have my advice to consult. Otherwise I would have
knew even then that the VB Bülach wanted to separate us again. This also explains why I did not get support in finding accommodation and the hearing before the court as long as my children was delayed until it was pointless.
also would have continued the therapy for as long until I had shown a degree of insight. I probably would have then continued to "Zyprexa" and "Temesta" take (see entry: http://namensaenderung.blogspot.com/2008/05/das-gutachden-der-klinik-hard-es-wurde.html ). To date, it is said that no mistakes were made.

Since I have other discrepancies are noticed in the report, I did law degree with the protocol of the district judge. A. Fischer, who made my hearing in the hospital compared Hard. It is amazing to me that Dr. Schawalder a term of the minutes of this hearing very different way, that it was a completely different meaning. Is now
what a judge says it like a psychiatrist or unformulated and this then gives an entirely different situation? In particular, I find it extreme that then the guardianship authority Bülach based on the opinion and not a copy of the protocol had
of the judge. Another time, I will discuss it in detail.


Here is a copy of the ticket from me than I of Canada on the Trans-Canada Airlines from Montreal to Zurich Kloten Airport

, BORDER. To show that I entered as a baby named Flück.

Fresh Blood After Cervical Biopsy

No direct release of the report of the clinic Hard

From the clinic I have requested my opinion hardware (see last Entry and

http://namensaenderung.blogspot.com/2008/05/das-gutachden-der-klinik-hard-es-wurde.html ). At the same time I became aware of the guardianship authority Bülach requested, my opinions and in two letters stated that a copy of my letters went to the county council Bülach. Of course I sent the letters to the clinic and hardware to the guardianship authority as written. Of the guardianship authority Bülach I got no response from the clinic and hardware following letter:

The hospital said hard, however, that the guardianship authority Bülach is the legal owner of my opinion. According to Dr. Marco Lanz then the report including confidentiality relieve Mr Dürsteler by the District Council served Bülach. A few days later I received a copy of Mr Dürsteler the opinion, but from the secrecy release only that, relating to the guardianship authority Bülach. The other side, on which I have given birth as mine person from maintaining confidentiality and Esther Zinn, I have not received.

Back when I signed the Confidentiality release, I already asked for a copy of this. There was Mr. Schawalder in the stress at that time, he told me that he would bring one next time. This he has not done so on the grounds that there are so many people the copier had. Again the next time the copier was broken and he would send me a copy. Of course, I got a copy.

After I let all the reports have before me, I noticed that none of these persons was asked of me.

The following is an excerpt from the report to detail that Mr. Huber made:
Here you can see that Mr Francis Xavier Huber of the guardianship authority Bülach normally found how to handle my medical Children Act: namely, that the district court simply Bülach was involved for a divorce.
In addition to Mr. Huber was the psychiatrist that he offered added that the name Gritti is deleted. By this statement it is clear that it even had a name change right never to be. In the letter to me (considering the 3 scans / letter of 26 October 1998 the entry http://namensaenderung.blogspot.com/2008/06/ergnzender-eintrag-zu-akte-153-und.html ) but Mr Francis Xavier Huber wrote of the guardianship authority Bülach that it performs a name change, and not simply the deletion of the name Gritti!
is mentioned in the covering letter is not even described a real change of name, but only the deletion of Gritti favor of Flück (then I had a name change sought only to completely Flück).

I also had in 1995 (1 scan / letter of 24 July 1995 in the entry http://namensaenderung.blogspot.com/2007/03/umgang-mit-medizinischen-kinderakten_20.html ) the deletion of "Gritti" in the guardianship authority Illnau-Effretikon applied locally. This was, however, by the Department of the Interior, but not this time accepted.
If it really is that simple but, I wonder, however: What did my lawyer? When I
regarding a telephone conversation with Mr Francis Xavier Huber of the VB Bülach addressed his application to the "name change" in dealing with my files said this, it was made no mistake and it was right, how to handle my file.


is the advice to "disease progression" that I was adopted.
I already have explained 100 times that my brother received an adoption, but I change the name. Access to the file said Dr. Schawalder simply that my file was partially granted. The fact is that I was basically given no access through the VB Bülach. Only after every legal action, I got files. For more content this part of the report see http://namensaenderung.blogspot.com/2007/05/die-medizinische-akte.html and http://namensaenderung.blogspot.com/2007/09/widerlegung-der-aussagen-von-werner.html .

In the same section:
to this section of the opinion, I do not go further here and refer you to a
http://namensaenderung.blogspot.com/2007/03/umgang-mit-medizinischen-kinderakten_20.html ).


It is interesting to read that writing assignable errors and misconduct of the guardianship authority Bülach be represented as delusional on my part. The 4th
last sentence: It should be appreciated that if his statements can not be confirmed by documents that are home are, it is applied thereby. In addition, psychiatrists were unwilling to address the other officials who were able to prove my statements. Only a few persons of the nursing staff were willing to listen properly.


From this excerpt you can see quite clearly that I am in the clinic Bülach not even have my advice to consult. Otherwise I would have
knew even then that the VB Bülach wanted to separate us again. This also explains why I did not get support in finding accommodation and the hearing before the court as long as my children was delayed until it was pointless.
also would have continued the therapy for as long until I had shown a degree of insight. I probably would have then continued to "Zyprexa" and "Temesta" take (see entry: http://namensaenderung.blogspot.com/2008/05/das-gutachden-der-klinik-hard-es-wurde.html ). To date, it is said that no mistakes were made.

Since I have other discrepancies are noticed in the report, I did law degree with the protocol of the district judge. A. Fischer, who made my hearing in the hospital compared Hard. It is amazing to me that Dr. Schawalder a term of the minutes of this hearing very different way, that it was a completely different meaning. Is now
what a judge says it like a psychiatrist or unformulated and this then gives an entirely different situation? In particular, I find it extreme that then the guardianship authority Bülach based on the opinion and not a copy of the protocol had
of the judge. Another time, I will discuss it in detail.


Here is a copy of the ticket from me than I of Canada on the Trans-Canada Airlines from Montreal to Zurich Kloten Airport

, BORDER. To show that I entered as a baby named Flück.

What Paper To Use For Waxing

access to the file name and chaos

This article from the 20 minutes of 11 September 2008 reconfirmed that one has the right to inspect records. Actually, would you as an individual the right to inspect and copy their files for years.

I Bülach the District Council, Mr Dürsteler addressed to this article. Now all that still have records of me and my children under lock and publish them, says Mr Dürsteler. The hospital must now give me the hard full opinion, and the remaining files.

I received the new social security card. There is added after the family name with a hyphen, the name Gritti.

When we moved to the new location had to make my children because Mr. Scherrer a clarification, because Mr. Scherrer had to do nothing better than such a process, not breakable to lead in track. As mentioned in previous entries of mine already, the woman has adhered to Pente no promise that everything is fine when we moved. I was thus quite into financial troubles. I have on the social services always tried to explain that my story, but they did not respond. I also got so until 2003 with great fight my files. My children could not even say what happened in Bülach something, because the Social Services said they were not responsible. To my name problem, I presented a lot of documents. But somehow this was simply ignored. When I was written on the letter referred Flück "I was pretty upset. I have said this also the social work that hurt me so. Without considering this, I was again in the next letter written by "called Flück. This was very hurtful that it could even read the letter carrier. One might then think that I provide as a false name.

When I complain to the competent Councillor complained, he said that this meet is even. It will someone explain to me what is it a concession if you have a birth name, this is not recognized as a valid name. Since when is a mockery of them meet one?

And even if this in the files of Bülach IT IS, why do you continue it, although I reported the bug several times? It has always been the word of Bülach of mine. Whether this is in the social sector of advance may be doubted.

on the registration certificate of the person reporting the Office I am in turn registered with the married name.

Then again, there are statements to which I am registered with "born Gritti. Even Mr Dürsteler of Bulach District Council has told me that this is also wrong.

Other offices then say that you are registered with them only with the married name and the name is thus not a problem. Then the next form is required but the birth name.

was on court documents, I even on 25 Born in December. On other documents, I was even born in November.

What I will discuss in detail is how to handle my kids. All those who testified positively about my children, were dismissed by Mrs Evelyn Pente, Mrs. Esther Zinn (former matron of the orphanage Florhof) as an instrument.

The psychiatrist in the clinic have never seen my kids hard. Nevertheless, they made a decision about them, and then only on the basis of the statements of the authorities. These statements were then taken even one to one. Other persons or documents I stated, were not consulted or honored.

Everyone can do but even the thought: Should not be asked all the people of "both" sides to create an objective opinion? The same is true for documents on it? I have tape recordings of what you hear, what, Mrs Esther Zinn of my children if they recommend it to other children, the UN Children's Convention. When asked about their negative information about my children to the psychiatrist, she has refused to explain to me the technical keywords, or why it has taken this "diagnosis" in this or that context. Even the scientific work of my Son she put out negative.

Would my children probably represent only the negative statements by Ms Ester Zinn, the guardianship authority Bülach and the psychiatrists would probably not have been such a photo.

I would be interested if others find it offensive when everything is pulled by their own children into the negative.

Speaking of laws: Sometimes when I read the laws, some of the enumeration of Article 9 of the Federal Constitution which apply to my case:

principle of good faith

Once an administration promise and / or covenant releases issued to support or be derived from the conduct of the Administration, can be expected, it is forced to abide by them or to the extent to be considered as possible (see Article 9 BV).

principle the prohibition of arbitrary

Article 9 BV: Every person has the right, without arbitrariness by the State authorities [...] to be treated. It is:

- if it senseless and useless, or contradictory,

- if they are not on factual grounds, refers

- if the same situations differently and that different situations the same way,

- if they violated clear law

- if in the more troubling way acting against the sense of justice and the sense of justice,
- their reasoning is contrary to the wording or purpose of a law.

What Paper To Use For Waxing

access to the file name and chaos

This article from the 20 minutes of 11 September 2008 reconfirmed that one has the right to inspect records. Actually, would you as an individual the right to inspect and copy their files for years.

I Bülach the District Council, Mr Dürsteler addressed to this article. Now all that still have records of me and my children under lock and publish them, says Mr Dürsteler. The hospital must now give me the hard full opinion, and the remaining files.

I received the new social security card. There is added after the family name with a hyphen, the name Gritti.

When we moved to the new location had to make my children because Mr. Scherrer a clarification, because Mr. Scherrer had to do nothing better than such a process, not breakable to lead in track. As mentioned in previous entries of mine already, the woman has adhered to Pente no promise that everything is fine when we moved. I was thus quite into financial troubles. I have on the social services always tried to explain that my story, but they did not respond. I also got so until 2003 with great fight my files. My children could not even say what happened in Bülach something, because the Social Services said they were not responsible. To my name problem, I presented a lot of documents. But somehow this was simply ignored. When I was written on the letter referred Flück "I was pretty upset. I have said this also the social work that hurt me so. Without considering this, I was again in the next letter written by "called Flück. This was very hurtful that it could even read the letter carrier. One might then think that I provide as a false name.

When I complain to the competent Councillor complained, he said that this meet is even. It will someone explain to me what is it a concession if you have a birth name, this is not recognized as a valid name. Since when is a mockery of them meet one?

And even if this in the files of Bülach IT IS, why do you continue it, although I reported the bug several times? It has always been the word of Bülach of mine. Whether this is in the social sector of advance may be doubted.

on the registration certificate of the person reporting the Office I am in turn registered with the married name.

Then again, there are statements to which I am registered with "born Gritti. Even Mr Dürsteler of Bulach District Council has told me that this is also wrong.

Other offices then say that you are registered with them only with the married name and the name is thus not a problem. Then the next form is required but the birth name.

was on court documents, I even on 25 Born in December. On other documents, I was even born in November.

What I will discuss in detail is how to handle my kids. All those who testified positively about my children, were dismissed by Mrs Evelyn Pente, Mrs. Esther Zinn (former matron of the orphanage Florhof) as an instrument.

The psychiatrist in the clinic have never seen my kids hard. Nevertheless, they made a decision about them, and then only on the basis of the statements of the authorities. These statements were then taken even one to one. Other persons or documents I stated, were not consulted or honored.

Everyone can do but even the thought: Should not be asked all the people of "both" sides to create an objective opinion? The same is true for documents on it? I have tape recordings of what you hear, what, Mrs Esther Zinn of my children if they recommend it to other children, the UN Children's Convention. When asked about their negative information about my children to the psychiatrist, she has refused to explain to me the technical keywords, or why it has taken this "diagnosis" in this or that context. Even the scientific work of my Son she put out negative.

Would my children probably represent only the negative statements by Ms Ester Zinn, the guardianship authority Bülach and the psychiatrists would probably not have been such a photo.

I would be interested if others find it offensive when everything is pulled by their own children into the negative.

Speaking of laws: Sometimes when I read the laws, some of the enumeration of Article 9 of the Federal Constitution which apply to my case:

principle of good faith

Once an administration promise and / or covenant releases issued to support or be derived from the conduct of the Administration, can be expected, it is forced to abide by them or to the extent to be considered as possible (see Article 9 BV).

principle the prohibition of arbitrary

Article 9 BV: Every person has the right, without arbitrariness by the State authorities [...] to be treated. It is:

- if it senseless and useless, or contradictory,

- if they are not on factual grounds, refers

- if the same situations differently and that different situations the same way,

- if they violated clear law

- if in the more troubling way acting against the sense of justice and the sense of justice,
- their reasoning is contrary to the wording or purpose of a law.