Kates Playground 2010?

destruction of files / Eveyln Pente lies the Court of Appeal Zurich to

destruction of files
early as the 1990s, I have tried to document all my children to come. At that time it was called by the various authorities that the documents were classified and therefore not accessible to me. Now I have tried in different places once the new laws to come to my files.
According to the latest statement has destroyed most of my files. In child psychiatry in Brüschhalde Männedorf there are now only a small pouch of originally more than one folder (these files I have not yet)! My children
files from children's home in Sonnenbühl Brütten today Elgg children's home were destroyed.
In Bassersdorf there is only a cover page of my files, nothing else! The new person with that authority itself was taken aback when she found this
Even my files from the time I was with my mother in Inselhofspital are no longer available. But those of my brother, who was born there still exist!

It's unbelievable, how to work with my document and avoided. At first I was denied this and then they will simply be destroyed!

my life because I always heard that I was descended from a rape, I was at the Children's Aid Society of Metropolitan Toronto, Canada asks whether they know anything about my father. This then wrote me the following Letters

There is nothing about a rape. And if according to the statement of regulators, in my half-sister, [See the description of the 6th Tape recording http://namensaenderung.blogspot.com/2007/12/wie-wenig-verstndnis-man-fr-ein-opfer.html and http://namensaenderung.blogspot.com/2006/12/wenn -man-the-name-a-pdophilen.html ] made my mother a criminal complaint, why then has the authority found nothing?
When I showed this letter to Swiss officials and social workers thought they only did I have the Canadian authorities, wrote this to calm me down. When Swiss officials work the way they have their own Behavior but not project to foreign authorities.
I'm proud to be a Canadian citizen when I think of it as I have been in Switzerland put obstacles in his way.


letter from Evelyn Pente to the High Court of Zurich
Following is the letter from Mrs. Evelyn Pente to the High Court of Zurich, because my children wanted a hearing before the court (the same views represented by Mrs Esther Zinn).

See also:
http://namensaenderung.blogspot.com/2008/02/nicht-eingehaltene-versprechen-von.html ,
http://namensaenderung.blogspot.com/2007/ 02/frau-pente-und-finanzen-frau-pente-die.html ,
http://namensaenderung.blogspot.com/2007/07/widersprche-von-frau-evelyne-pente-und.html .

The order of Pente Evelyn would have been to represent the interests of my children. As you can see but at this letter, she did nothing about it and even tried to achieve the opposite by not agreeing to the appeal. In the next sentence she wrote but then again, that they have a recourse against the achievement of the 16th Year of life supports.
Evelyne Pente does not see that this is not a situation that one can weigh up and down, but it is the law of my children! Furthermore, would not be a refusal on the right of hearing pursuant to UN Children's Convention lawful been, no matter what she knits together arguments for themselves. Such arguments have

sole purpose that children can not make any statements.
addition it has been lying to the Supreme Court with this letter by saying that "the processing of the past will not be forgotten." If we happened to the "past" responded, she said only that it has been "before their time" and it had nothing to do with it.

on what I will discuss in detail some other time is that my former foster mother to return me to my mother and Jürg Gritti as a new law called "family return ' justified. Only in the 1990s with the delivery of other documents I've noticed that they lied to me. Of course, I've faced it, but she denies that she ever made such a statement. She was very contradictory.

Kates Playground 2010?

destruction of files / Eveyln Pente lies the Court of Appeal Zurich to

destruction of files
early as the 1990s, I have tried to document all my children to come. At that time it was called by the various authorities that the documents were classified and therefore not accessible to me. Now I have tried in different places once the new laws to come to my files.
According to the latest statement has destroyed most of my files. In child psychiatry in Brüschhalde Männedorf there are now only a small pouch of originally more than one folder (these files I have not yet)! My children
files from children's home in Sonnenbühl Brütten today Elgg children's home were destroyed.
In Bassersdorf there is only a cover page of my files, nothing else! The new person with that authority itself was taken aback when she found this
Even my files from the time I was with my mother in Inselhofspital are no longer available. But those of my brother, who was born there still exist!

It's unbelievable, how to work with my document and avoided. At first I was denied this and then they will simply be destroyed!

my life because I always heard that I was descended from a rape, I was at the Children's Aid Society of Metropolitan Toronto, Canada asks whether they know anything about my father. This then wrote me the following Letters

There is nothing about a rape. And if according to the statement of regulators, in my half-sister, [See the description of the 6th Tape recording http://namensaenderung.blogspot.com/2007/12/wie-wenig-verstndnis-man-fr-ein-opfer.html and http://namensaenderung.blogspot.com/2006/12/wenn -man-the-name-a-pdophilen.html ] made my mother a criminal complaint, why then has the authority found nothing?
When I showed this letter to Swiss officials and social workers thought they only did I have the Canadian authorities, wrote this to calm me down. When Swiss officials work the way they have their own Behavior but not project to foreign authorities.
I'm proud to be a Canadian citizen when I think of it as I have been in Switzerland put obstacles in his way.


letter from Evelyn Pente to the High Court of Zurich
Following is the letter from Mrs. Evelyn Pente to the High Court of Zurich, because my children wanted a hearing before the court (the same views represented by Mrs Esther Zinn).

See also:
http://namensaenderung.blogspot.com/2008/02/nicht-eingehaltene-versprechen-von.html ,
http://namensaenderung.blogspot.com/2007/ 02/frau-pente-und-finanzen-frau-pente-die.html ,
http://namensaenderung.blogspot.com/2007/07/widersprche-von-frau-evelyne-pente-und.html .

The order of Pente Evelyn would have been to represent the interests of my children. As you can see but at this letter, she did nothing about it and even tried to achieve the opposite by not agreeing to the appeal. In the next sentence she wrote but then again, that they have a recourse against the achievement of the 16th Year of life supports.
Evelyne Pente does not see that this is not a situation that one can weigh up and down, but it is the law of my children! Furthermore, would not be a refusal on the right of hearing pursuant to UN Children's Convention lawful been, no matter what she knits together arguments for themselves. Such arguments have

sole purpose that children can not make any statements.
addition it has been lying to the Supreme Court with this letter by saying that "the processing of the past will not be forgotten." If we happened to the "past" responded, she said only that it has been "before their time" and it had nothing to do with it.

on what I will discuss in detail some other time is that my former foster mother to return me to my mother and Jürg Gritti as a new law called "family return ' justified. Only in the 1990s with the delivery of other documents I've noticed that they lied to me. Of course, I've faced it, but she denies that she ever made such a statement. She was very contradictory.

Fullmetalachemist V.s. Bleach Game

No case files of children in the orphanage Florhof

supplement to the last entry

I still have the right Medical Records after a few calls, I hang out these to get from the clinic Hard. It would mean first that it was only that of Medical Records (July 11, 2001), which I got with the advice and applied only to the guardianship authority Bülach. For this I I signed, I do not remember.
have signed but I was absolutely sure a confidentiality confinement, where all persons were given by me on it. Subsequently I have received it, signed by me on 23 July 2001. This was, among other things, the Supervisor of the Canton of Zurich, which could confirm how to handle my files. Also on the list there was one prosecutor who called my children and told them that they can not be forced to an opinion. In the report, it is but I would not have my children sent to child and youth mental health services for an opinion. See also the entries
http://namensaenderung.blogspot.com/2008/08/gutachten-ohne-kenntnis-darber.html and
http://namensaenderung.blogspot.com/2007/10/vortuschen-einer-namensnderung.html ( Letter dated 26 April 2001, the last scan).
has also helped the person during the scientific work of my older son, not interviewed, as well as my brother Andres Gasser, living in Schaffhausen.


Esther Zinn and record-keeping on children in the orphanage Florhof

See also http://namensaenderung.blogspot.com/2008/05/das-gutachden-der-klinik-hard-es-wurde . html. How to use the scans of my reports from the Hard Clinic (bottom scans of the aforementioned entry) see, I then get a part of my opinion. In this excerpt also a few statements by Mrs Esther Zinn were held, which was then the matron of the orphanage Florhof. This part I got in September 2002 and called on Mrs. Esther Zinn even then, so that they do their data could explain to my children, see

http://namensaenderung.blogspot.com/2008/09/akteneinsicht-und- namenschaos.html . Even then she did not give any information and is expressed only in an aggressive tone on children and the scientific work of my son.
The copy of the full report, I received recently (see last entry), I now get an insight on all the statements of Mrs. Esther Zinn, now superintendent of the children's castle Regensberg. I therefore called Esther Zinn last week to ask you whether to write the children's home Florhof no reports of the children, as I said before, the current national director of the orphanage Florhof (which surprised me very much). Click here to download tape receptacle 16.

Mrs Zinn confirmed to me that no files will be performed on children. Then I asked, that they can make serious statements (in report) and this evidence should not be. Your statement was that This case is already some years ago and they do not know after 900 children, which was characteristic of which child. They also have no desire to
people like me to discuss after all these years about such things. In the end they said I had done my sons massively broken and she hung up the phone easily. The whole conversation and thus the rest of the conversation can be downloaded as tape receptacle 17 . (My name and are "as valid" diagnosis of Mrs. Esther Zinn I have cut).
After this conversation, I called the District Council and Bulach asked if he could ask Mr. Dürsteler Mrs Zinn, how and where I said to my children 've made ready. Mrs Zinn has the District Council Bülach been no information as to how I should have made my children ready. She also said that no records of children in the passage home
Florhof be performed.
I think it's bad if people can do in positions such as Mrs Zinn serious statements, but must prove this in any way or documented. Their statements were taken but 1 to 1 of verifiers, and their recommendation that my children would have in a long-term home. This opinion of the Department is apparently so hard
property of the authority: the guardianship authority Bülach. These are based again on the advice, and consequently on the testimony Esther Zinn.

I can in my case in an emergency, the statements of Mrs. Esther Zinn refute various documents, but what about those parents and children who can not do?
As you can see even in my story, but can occur such files again.

How could read from the entry http://namensaenderung.blogspot.com/2007/07/widersprche-von-frau-evelyne-pente-und.html has, Mrs. Esther Zinn at the exit interview from the passage home Florhof against the teachers of my older son's behavior even more aggressive.

Fullmetalachemist V.s. Bleach Game

No case files of children in the orphanage Florhof

supplement to the last entry

I still have the right Medical Records after a few calls, I hang out these to get from the clinic Hard. It would mean first that it was only that of Medical Records (July 11, 2001), which I got with the advice and applied only to the guardianship authority Bülach. For this I I signed, I do not remember.
have signed but I was absolutely sure a confidentiality confinement, where all persons were given by me on it. Subsequently I have received it, signed by me on 23 July 2001. This was, among other things, the Supervisor of the Canton of Zurich, which could confirm how to handle my files. Also on the list there was one prosecutor who called my children and told them that they can not be forced to an opinion. In the report, it is but I would not have my children sent to child and youth mental health services for an opinion. See also the entries
http://namensaenderung.blogspot.com/2008/08/gutachten-ohne-kenntnis-darber.html and
http://namensaenderung.blogspot.com/2007/10/vortuschen-einer-namensnderung.html ( Letter dated 26 April 2001, the last scan).
has also helped the person during the scientific work of my older son, not interviewed, as well as my brother Andres Gasser, living in Schaffhausen.


Esther Zinn and record-keeping on children in the orphanage Florhof

See also http://namensaenderung.blogspot.com/2008/05/das-gutachden-der-klinik-hard-es-wurde . html. How to use the scans of my reports from the Hard Clinic (bottom scans of the aforementioned entry) see, I then get a part of my opinion. In this excerpt also a few statements by Mrs Esther Zinn were held, which was then the matron of the orphanage Florhof. This part I got in September 2002 and called on Mrs. Esther Zinn even then, so that they do their data could explain to my children, see

http://namensaenderung.blogspot.com/2008/09/akteneinsicht-und- namenschaos.html . Even then she did not give any information and is expressed only in an aggressive tone on children and the scientific work of my son.
The copy of the full report, I received recently (see last entry), I now get an insight on all the statements of Mrs. Esther Zinn, now superintendent of the children's castle Regensberg. I therefore called Esther Zinn last week to ask you whether to write the children's home Florhof no reports of the children, as I said before, the current national director of the orphanage Florhof (which surprised me very much). Click here to download tape receptacle 16.

Mrs Zinn confirmed to me that no files will be performed on children. Then I asked, that they can make serious statements (in report) and this evidence should not be. Your statement was that This case is already some years ago and they do not know after 900 children, which was characteristic of which child. They also have no desire to
people like me to discuss after all these years about such things. In the end they said I had done my sons massively broken and she hung up the phone easily. The whole conversation and thus the rest of the conversation can be downloaded as tape receptacle 17 . (My name and are "as valid" diagnosis of Mrs. Esther Zinn I have cut).
After this conversation, I called the District Council and Bulach asked if he could ask Mr. Dürsteler Mrs Zinn, how and where I said to my children 've made ready. Mrs Zinn has the District Council Bülach been no information as to how I should have made my children ready. She also said that no records of children in the passage home
Florhof be performed.
I think it's bad if people can do in positions such as Mrs Zinn serious statements, but must prove this in any way or documented. Their statements were taken but 1 to 1 of verifiers, and their recommendation that my children would have in a long-term home. This opinion of the Department is apparently so hard
property of the authority: the guardianship authority Bülach. These are based again on the advice, and consequently on the testimony Esther Zinn.

I can in my case in an emergency, the statements of Mrs. Esther Zinn refute various documents, but what about those parents and children who can not do?
As you can see even in my story, but can occur such files again.

How could read from the entry http://namensaenderung.blogspot.com/2007/07/widersprche-von-frau-evelyne-pente-und.html has, Mrs. Esther Zinn at the exit interview from the passage home Florhof against the teachers of my older son's behavior even more aggressive.