Gift Ideas For Strock Patients

advice without some knowledge of

This week I found on the Internet is still an interesting article of the K-tips, see here: http://www.ktipp.ch/themen/beitrag/1025697/Psychisch_krank_Darf_ich_die_Akten_einsehen

Unfortunately it so that it is done in practice different, as can be seen from my records. For example, one must know first of all, that was created over a one report. Only by chance, we learned that women had created Dr. Simon of the Child and Youth Mental Health Service of the Canton of Zurich on my children an opinion. We were given by Dr. Simon only a letter dated 3 November 2000, in which she confirmed that my children do not want to come to an opinion. In the letter was not why my kids did not go to that opinion, which they justified in detail. Moreover, a prosecutor told them that they can not be forced to an opinion.

We were not informed that a medical report is then made solely on the basis of the record. When we learned that there is such a medical document expertise, we insisted to get this. As you can see from the above link, this is the right conferred to my children. As we look to Francis Xavier Huber of the guardianship authority Bulach, who commissioned the report, argued that this meant that we only Dr. Simon in whose presence can inspect and the VB was not competent to hand us a copy. called

When my older son, Dr. Simon ( tape recording 15 downloads ) said this to him, that we may already have access to the report, but not easy just to her as a consultant, but the client and this is the guardianship authority Bülach.

In the following, a montage of a letter of the Supervisor of the Canton of Zurich, who writes that there are no overriding reasons in our case for restricting the right of access.

The following is the answer of the guardianship authority Bulach, 26 April 2001. (See last letter on http://namensaenderung.blogspot.com/2007/10/vortuschen-einer-namensnderung.html ). Although Huber and Werner Franz Xavier Scherrer still in the letter to us looking for reasons to refuse to copy the files, they have nonetheless settled as a copy of this letter to me. Not because we had the right to do so, but because the guardianship authority has proven Bülach than generous.

the time period of 6 months notice until we were given a copy. This was often the case and also regarding the clinic Hard, responsibility shifted back and forth.

What I want to mention here again: When none of the guardianship authority Bulach, Youth Secretariat Bulach, Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Service of Canton of Zurich or the children's home Florhof planned or conducted hearings or investigations could my children freely happened on the external. This happened with justification, that this was not the task, one not talking about people who are not present or is only talking to the future.