This article from the 20 minutes of 11 September 2008 reconfirmed that one has the right to inspect records. Actually, would you as an individual the right to inspect and copy their files for years.
I Bülach the District Council, Mr Dürsteler addressed to this article. Now all that still have records of me and my children under lock and publish them, says Mr Dürsteler. The hospital must now give me the hard full opinion, and the remaining files.
I received the new social security card. There is added after the family name with a hyphen, the name Gritti.
When we moved to the new location had to make my children because Mr. Scherrer a clarification, because Mr. Scherrer had to do nothing better than such a process, not breakable to lead in track. As mentioned in previous entries of mine already, the woman has adhered to Pente no promise that everything is fine when we moved. I was thus quite into financial troubles. I have on the social services always tried to explain that my story, but they did not respond. I also got so until 2003 with great fight my files. My children could not even say what happened in Bülach something, because the Social Services said they were not responsible. To my name problem, I presented a lot of documents. But somehow this was simply ignored. When I was written on the letter referred Flück "I was pretty upset. I have said this also the social work that hurt me so. Without considering this, I was again in the next letter written by "called Flück. This was very hurtful that it could even read the letter carrier. One might then think that I provide as a false name.
When I complain to the competent Councillor complained, he said that this meet is even. It will someone explain to me what is it a concession if you have a birth name, this is not recognized as a valid name. Since when is a mockery of them meet one?
And even if this in the files of Bülach IT IS, why do you continue it, although I reported the bug several times? It has always been the word of Bülach of mine. Whether this is in the social sector of advance may be doubted.
on the registration certificate of the person reporting the Office I am in turn registered with the married name.
Then again, there are statements to which I am registered with "born Gritti. Even Mr Dürsteler of Bulach District Council has told me that this is also wrong.
Other offices then say that you are registered with them only with the married name and the name is thus not a problem. Then the next form is required but the birth name.
was on court documents, I even on 25 Born in December. On other documents, I was even born in November.
What I will discuss in detail is how to handle my kids. All those who testified positively about my children, were dismissed by Mrs Evelyn Pente, Mrs. Esther Zinn (former matron of the orphanage Florhof) as an instrument.
The psychiatrist in the clinic have never seen my kids hard. Nevertheless, they made a decision about them, and then only on the basis of the statements of the authorities. These statements were then taken even one to one. Other persons or documents I stated, were not consulted or honored.
Everyone can do but even the thought: Should not be asked all the people of "both" sides to create an objective opinion? The same is true for documents on it? I have tape recordings of what you hear, what, Mrs Esther Zinn of my children if they recommend it to other children, the UN Children's Convention. When asked about their negative information about my children to the psychiatrist, she has refused to explain to me the technical keywords, or why it has taken this "diagnosis" in this or that context. Even the scientific work of my Son she put out negative.
Would my children probably represent only the negative statements by Ms Ester Zinn, the guardianship authority Bülach and the psychiatrists would probably not have been such a photo.
I would be interested if others find it offensive when everything is pulled by their own children into the negative.
Speaking of laws: Sometimes when I read the laws, some of the enumeration of Article 9 of the Federal Constitution which apply to my case:
principle of good faith
Once an administration promise and / or covenant releases issued to support or be derived from the conduct of the Administration, can be expected, it is forced to abide by them or to the extent to be considered as possible (see Article 9 BV).
principle the prohibition of arbitrary
Article 9 BV: Every person has the right, without arbitrariness by the State authorities [...] to be treated. It is:
- if it senseless and useless, or contradictory,
- if they are not on factual grounds, refers
- if the same situations differently and that different situations the same way,
- if they violated clear law
- if in the more troubling way acting against the sense of justice and the sense of justice,
- their reasoning is contrary to the wording or purpose of a law.
0 comments:
Post a Comment