destruction of files
early as the 1990s, I have tried to document all my children to come. At that time it was called by the various authorities that the documents were classified and therefore not accessible to me. Now I have tried in different places once the new laws to come to my files.
According to the latest statement has destroyed most of my files. In child psychiatry in Brüschhalde Männedorf there are now only a small pouch of originally more than one folder (these files I have not yet)! My children
files from children's home in Sonnenbühl Brütten today Elgg children's home were destroyed.
In Bassersdorf there is only a cover page of my files, nothing else! The new person with that authority itself was taken aback when she found this
Even my files from the time I was with my mother in Inselhofspital are no longer available. But those of my brother, who was born there still exist!
It's unbelievable, how to work with my document and avoided. At first I was denied this and then they will simply be destroyed!
my life because I always heard that I was descended from a rape, I was at the Children's Aid Society of Metropolitan Toronto, Canada asks whether they know anything about my father. This then wrote me the following Letters
There is nothing about a rape. And if according to the statement of regulators, in my half-sister, [See the description of the 6th Tape recording http://namensaenderung.blogspot.com/2007/12/wie-wenig-verstndnis-man-fr-ein-opfer.html and http://namensaenderung.blogspot.com/2006/12/wenn -man-the-name-a-pdophilen.html ] made my mother a criminal complaint, why then has the authority found nothing?
When I showed this letter to Swiss officials and social workers thought they only did I have the Canadian authorities, wrote this to calm me down. When Swiss officials work the way they have their own Behavior but not project to foreign authorities.
I'm proud to be a Canadian citizen when I think of it as I have been in Switzerland put obstacles in his way.
letter from Evelyn Pente to the High Court of Zurich
Following is the letter from Mrs. Evelyn Pente to the High Court of Zurich, because my children wanted a hearing before the court (the same views represented by Mrs Esther Zinn).
See also:
http://namensaenderung.blogspot.com/2008/02/nicht-eingehaltene-versprechen-von.html ,
http://namensaenderung.blogspot.com/2007/ 02/frau-pente-und-finanzen-frau-pente-die.html ,
http://namensaenderung.blogspot.com/2007/07/widersprche-von-frau-evelyne-pente-und.html .
The order of Pente Evelyn would have been to represent the interests of my children. As you can see but at this letter, she did nothing about it and even tried to achieve the opposite by not agreeing to the appeal. In the next sentence she wrote but then again, that they have a recourse against the achievement of the 16th Year of life supports.
Evelyne Pente does not see that this is not a situation that one can weigh up and down, but it is the law of my children! Furthermore, would not be a refusal on the right of hearing pursuant to UN Children's Convention lawful been, no matter what she knits together arguments for themselves. Such arguments have
sole purpose that children can not make any statements.
addition it has been lying to the Supreme Court with this letter by saying that "the processing of the past will not be forgotten." If we happened to the "past" responded, she said only that it has been "before their time" and it had nothing to do with it.
on what I will discuss in detail some other time is that my former foster mother to return me to my mother and Jürg Gritti as a new law called "family return ' justified. Only in the 1990s with the delivery of other documents I've noticed that they lied to me. Of course, I've faced it, but she denies that she ever made such a statement. She was very contradictory.
0 comments:
Post a Comment