My children had to make some clarifications at the Youth Secretariat Bulach, to which they went. This was done because of the divorce. They were, however, lied to and deceived and justify my children and I had a continuous source of gossip, which went out by the Youth Secretariat and the guardianship authority Bülach. On this I will talk more at another time.
We were indeed using the psychological services as an agent for the grant of my older Son and because of the unique classification of my younger son. Before, I was already at the school board with Mr. U. Jäger, and H. Plattner ( http://namensaenderung.blogspot.com/2007/09/widerlegung-der-aussagen-von-werner.html ), but these felt not responsible. When it became clear just before the summer holidays 2000, the school psychologist Rolf Fravi is not paid for his work in our case, I was pretty upset and my kids were angry and disappointed. The response of the authorities was only that one can also look after the summer holidays. My children said all relevant authorities point out that after the summer holidays no longer in the school will go.
side of that statement was the reason that employees of the Youth Secretariat and the guardianship authority Bülach Bülach constantly to the teachers of my children went there and caught up with inquiries about them. This would not have been the problem since they did it because of the divorce. The problem was that while some things also told the teachers, so my children had to talk about the total annual often during the break or during the lessons with the teacher's desk with the teacher. Again, the staff member of the Youth Secretariat, Mrs. Caprez, the teacher of my oldest son's "only" caught up inquiries, but this time my then 10-year-old son asked if he and his brother had the same father! My son came in one of the bigger breaks broken home. Even when class switching my older son, she went in front word go as the new teacher without that my son had already seen. My children were afraid that this would continue in school and in high school.
Today is my guess that it was planned to escalate the situation to proceed against me because I insisted on my rights, such as privacy and access to documents.
As my children after the summer 2000 is no longer went to school, the guardianship authority Bülach 29 September 2000 at Children's and Youth Mental Health Bülach Service commissioned a report in order. After we learn about it by Mr Francis Xavier Huber of the guardianship authority Bulach, my son asked when Kindernottelefon whether one could force them to an opinion. They have forwarded the matter to a prosecutor, who then called my children and said they could not force them. On another day, then called my older son to the children and youth psychiatric service. The second phone call he finally reached Dr. D. Simon, which was responsible for this report. My son told her what all is in Bülach previously happened and told her that they do not force that, according to the prosecutor to an opinion can. should speak to the question of my son, when they would come, even at the events in Bulach and whether she or I will receive a copy of this opinion, said Dr. D. Simon, with a clear no. This, they reasoned that questions are not from the side of my sons and statements from them on their behalf. Similarly, we would get a copy of the opinion. When asked who will ever get the report, told my son that this would be Mr Francis Xavier Huber of the VB Bülach (see also the entry: http://namensaenderung.blogspot.com/2007/10/vortuschen -a-namensnderung.html and http://namensaenderung.blogspot.com/2008/08/gutachten-ohne-kenntnis-darber.html ). knew
Since my children like the guardianship authority Bülach already dealt with my medical records and because Mr. Huber will evaluate that report, my children decided not to go to for advice, Dr. D. Simon.
On 5 October 2000 (see http://namensaenderung.blogspot.com/2008/06/ergnzender-eintrag-zu-akte-153-und.html and http://namensaenderung.blogspot.com/2007/09/ refutation-of-state-of-werner.html ) I had asked the county council Bülach a supervisory complaint and recusal. On 15 December 2000, the case was forwarded to the guardianship authority Opfikon. The following excerpt can be seen also that the District Council Bülach in paragraph 2 does not think the violations did not react with the untenable ground that this had no effect on our future.
As agreed with that authority, we have this call for an interview. However, it was said that it was not her job to talk about what had happened in Bulach, but only about school and future. This meant that my younger son will go to secondary school and my older son will continue to remain in high school. On 23 February 2001, I received the following letter from the District Council Bülach with the request to a proxy:
I, in my View all these files had already, I told the county council Bulach, I could send the files to the same Opfikon with other files. This they would not. A closer reading of the document list, I was puzzled and asked the county council Bulach, whether it is labeled with letters to handle this letter: I know
What rumors halfway in talks is that there is a woman of Dr. D. Simon advice on my children were. From then on, I asked for that opinion, but what I was denied. My question to the District Council Bülach send me again a plea for partial Aktenerhausgabe (see letter from the District Council Bülach of 23 February), but a precise indication of the Letter from the child and adolescent psychiatric service was not made. The longer the more I got the feeling that it does not act to the letter of KJPD, which I mentioned earlier (see letter from Dr. Simon D Bülach to VB). Then I again asked if it was a question for an opinion. Then I got no answer.
Thereupon I obviously no signature on authority of a partial surrender document given.
What my children and I did not know was that it was Dr. D. Simon basis of records, which they got even from the VB Bulach, a filing report. Neither Dr. D. Simon nor Mr. Huber of the guardianship authority Bülach have said the outset, what will be the consequences.
It turned out later that Franz Xavier Huber of the VB Bülach even against the data protection officer of the Canton of Zurich, wrote that the guardianship authority Bülach main content is to hold the opinion
( http://namensaenderung.blogspot.com/2007 / 10/vortuschen-einer-namensnderung.html ) last letter, the lowest letter section)
It can therefore conclude that it is this "letter" from the Child and Youth Mental Health Service Bülach acted to the document approved!
During the conversation I had the sense all the time that the Opfikon files already had authority. With publication of files that I received in 2003, this has then confirmed.
The county Bülach wrote in his order of 23 March 2001 that it is a "unencumbered new beginning" was.
there you have to explain to me what is a new beginning when my younger son wanted to continue to grade in junior high school and my older son would continue to secondary school are to attend. Had it not to include an unloaded fresh start, that my children would have a statement about the experiences with the Youth Secretariat and the VB Bülach can do? to a previous blog entry: simulating a change of name ( http://namensaenderung.blogspot.com/2007/10/vortuschen-einer-namensnderung.html and complementary http://namensaenderung.blogspot.com/2007/08 / Dealing-with-right-of-demanding kindern.html ):
The "official" version of the events of 18 April 2001, recorded in the memorandum as follows:
If you were to this file only give so without any explanation, as has Franz Xavier Huber done very well, one would think that I Heidi Leibundgut, SP Bulach, and Brigitte Zolliker, EVP Bulach, directly opposite stood.
As is clear from my post, this was not the case and even the police officer wrote in his Ausrückbericht that I could not know that these two women were present (link directly to the Act on the blog pretending a name change: http:// 4.bp.blogspot.com/_s5O5f23rg2I/Rxi_cwlq3TI/AAAAAAAAAOc/nHL3kQvt54g/s1600-h/pol2 + (Custom). jpg)!
When I told my version of the District Council Bülach or the education authority, had not believed me. And in a telephone conversation I said Franz Xavier Huber only "... for what you tell stories."
What I deal in more detail in a later entry , Will as the anger started with the guardianship authorities Illnau-Effretikon and Bülach to 1995: How do I suddenly lose access had ran to my bank account, how everything (health insurance, tax returns etc) is only about social workers without my participation, prevention of remedial courses for my children (for example, women Caprez found by the Youth Secretariat Bülach that my older son is not the Early English must and the upper stage to be adequate, negative attitudes toward computers and especially with regard to my younger son was a course on figurative drawing is that the expression of painting in School-rich). I would have had the time, well this is my financial resources Children to pay, only my bank account was blocked as mentioned by the authorities and everything was about them.
0 comments:
Post a Comment