Network Camera Inurl:multicameraframe?mode=

impossible Bulach account closure at CS (Schweizerische Kreditanstalt)

In Switzerland planning to extend the reorganization of the guardianship authority. Then called the guardianship authority "for children and adults Protection Agency (Kesbern).

On 6 May 1995, I announced my bank account (see future blog), as evidenced by the following copy.

I then Then, when the money from the account wanted to stand at the counter, it was not possible. However, I was able gradually to withdraw from ATM machines in small amounts. As a woman from the Youth Secretariat Caprez Bülach of the termination of my account at the former SKA (Schweizerische Kreditanstalt, now Credit Suisse) found out they wanted me at the office of the Zurich Cantonal Bank in Bülach open a new bank account. Over time, I became suspicious that she was always on the bench. I told her there in Bulach, there are other banks and that it's none of that anyway, where I have my account. Since I volunteer in the recreation area for children to work, it was my job at companies including small prizes for the kids competitions of a solid gain. Among other things, I could walk past the store at the Zurich Cantonal Bank in Bulach and pick up freebies. This happened to Mr. cardboard, in this Executive Branch. This was also the President of the guardianship authority Bülach and was also involved in our case. See the following scan.

When I realized that I felt before we in the wrong movie. Now I was very clear why women Caprez wanted me to just open an account at ZKB, if so also the President of the guardianship authority work there. I find the result to be very strong conflict of interest and scope for theories, which would thus have all can. Meanwhile, I had to
then notice that my account termination at CS was simply ignored. I was on the account that there should be no longer actually paid money budget.

On 8 September 1995, I received a notification of receipt, that is no longer transferred to my bank account actually existing SKA DM 120,000 .-.

I was amazed not bad. I immediately went to the bank to ask where the money came from. Although I am the woman at the counter several times said that it was not was a question of my money, they just said it was questionable I did not even remember what I bought the securities. I then made legitimately a scene. Because the bank insisted that it was a question of my money, I said stop, I would like to sell everything. Only then was the SKA suspicious and began to check. It turned out that it was a false booking, which was then canceled.
Everything was alien to determine how much budget money I get, I would have to raise my children and what I had to do or be, etc. In the tax returns from 1995 until the divorce, I got no insight as well. The reasoning of the authorities was that the husband is the head of the family and that sort of thing the wife is none. Since my former husband for depression in the hospital was hard put, thus automatically the authorities at the head of the family. Despite trying my hand, the return was refused. I then called the Federal Office of Justice in Bern, to inform me about it. Mr. Sutter, my contact person at the Federal Office of Justice told me that this is not true that the husband is the head of the family. He could explain to me all the legal issues so that I understood it and he gave me the necessary clauses, with which I would have the authorities can show that they are wrong. The authorities in Bülach I got the answer by phone only "signs in Bern many things, when the day is long ".